Russian Art & Architecture
From icons and onion domes to suprematism and the Stalin
baroque, Russian art and architecture seems to many visitors to Russia to be a
rather baffling array of exotic forms and alien sensibilities. Without any
sense of the rich tradition of Russian culture, an appreciation of the
country's enormous artistic wealth becomes a game of historical
anecdote--"the church where so-and-so took refuge from
what's-his-name"--or a meaningless collection of aesthetic
baubles--"I like the blue domes the best." In fact, Russian art and
architecture are not nearly so difficult to understand as many people think,
and knowing even a little bit about why they look the way they do and what they
mean brings to life the culture and personality of the entire country.
Unlike the pictorial tradition that westerners have become
accustomed to, the Russian icon tradition is not about the representation of
physical space or appearance. Icons are images intended to aid contemplative
prayer, and in that sense they're more concerned with conveying meditative harmony
than with laying out a realistic scene. Rather than sizing up the figure in an
icon by judging its distortion level, take a look at the way the lines that
compose the figure are arranged and balanced, the way they move your eye
around. If you get the sense that the figures are a little haunting, that's
good. They weren't painted to be charming but to inspire reflection and
self-examination. If you feel as if you have to stand and appreciate every icon
you see, you aren't going to enjoy any of them. Try instead to take a little
more time with just one or two, not examining their every detail but simply
enjoying a few moments of thought as your eye takes its own course.
The best collections of icons are to be found in the
Tretyakov Gallery and the Russian Museum, though of course many Russian
churches have preserved or restored their traditional works.
The rising influence of European culture in Russia during
the 17th and 18th centuries brought Russian artwork closer to the familiar traditions
of western painting. It wasn't until the end of the 19th century that the next
great body of uniquely Russian artistic styles arose, having developed in
conjunction with liberal forces of social reform. This modern movement took
many different directions almost from its inception, and it would be impossible
to describe all of them. However, even a very general acquaintance with their
common ideas and interests makes their work much more accessible.
From the start, the modern art movement was concerned with
breaking away from the classical tradition and creating a new kind of art that
was intimately engaged with the daily life of Russian society. It developed a
renewed interest in traditional Russian art forms, including both decorative
folk art and, of course, icon painting. From decorative art it gained an
appreciation of the power of abstract geometrical patterns--lines, shapes, and
color were used to construct rhythms and energetic forms, not necessarily to
depict objects or actual spaces. The re-examination of icon painting made
painters more aware of the power of a flat, two-dimensional visual perspective.
In other words, they realized that they could treat the canvas like a canvas,
rather than trying to give the impression that it was a window into a space.
From the end of the nineteenth century until about 1910, the
modern art movement remained most interested in traditional aspects of Russian
life--religion and village life were as influential as the life of the great
cities. As the forces of social reform became more closely linked to the rising
population of industrial workers, Russia's avant-garde artists turned
increasingly to the factory and the frenetic pace of urban life for
inspiration. Brilliant colours, simplified and sharply angular forms, and an
emphasis on the liberatory energy of the modern world became the basis for new
and increasingly abstract compositions. Cubo-Futurism, Rayonnism and
Suprematism were the most important of the styles and schools that emerged
during this time. Among their most prominent artists were Kasimir Malevich,
Vladimir Tatlin, Mikhail Larionov, and Anna Goncharova.
After the 1917 Revolution, the Russian Avant-Garde leapt
into the service of the new Bolshevik regime. It seemed to promise just the
sort of break into a new world, and sweeping away of the old, that they had
been working for in art for years. They produced political posters, organized
street pageants and fairs, and, most notably, carried out the design of the
country's great public spaces for anniversary celebrations of the Revolution.
Caught up in the new regime's emphasis on the importance of industrial power,
they began to bring to composition a sense of the rationality and technological
focus of industrial work and design. Constructivism, as this style is known,
continued to evolve into the late 1920s, when the conservatism of the Stalinist
state renounced the Avant-Garde in favor of Soviet Realism. Many of the
prominent artists of the earlier schools played a central role in Constructivism,
especially Tatlin. Other well-known artists of the Constructivist movement
include Alexander Rodchenko, Varvara Stepanova, and Liubov Popova.
Repudiated by the Stalinist government and neglected in the
west, the Russian Avant-Garde has only recently received the attention it
deserves. The Russian Museum in St. Petersburg possesses the finest collection
of its work.
Architecture
The centers of medieval church architecture followed the
shifting dominance of old Russia's cities--from Kiev to Novgorod and Pskov,
and, from the end of the 15th century, Moscow. With the establishment of a
unified Russian state under Ivan III, foreign architecture began to appear in
Russia. The first instance of such foreign work is Moscow's great Assumption
Cathedral, completed in 1479 by the Bolognese architect Aritotle Fioravanti.
The cathedral is actually a remarkable synthesis of traditional Russian
architectural styles, though its classical proportions mark it as a work of the
Italian Renaissance. The Russian tradition experienced a brief period of
renewed influence under Ivan IV (the Terrible), under whose reign the legendary
Cathedral of St. Basil's was built. In general, however, the Tsars began to
align themselves increasingly with European architectural styles. The great
example of this shift was Peter the Great, who designed St. Petersburg in
accordance with prevailing European design. His successors continued the
pattern, hiring the Italian architect Rastrelli to produce the rococo Winter
Palace and Smolny Cathedral. Under Catherine the Great, the rococo was set
aside for neoclassicism, completing St. Petersburg's thoroughly European
topography.
During the nineteenth century a fresh interest in
traditional Russian forms arose. Like the associated movement in the visual
arts, this revival of older styles participated in the creation of an
avant-garde movement in the early twentieth century. For a brief period
following the 1917 Revolution, the avant-garde Constructivist movement gained
sufficient influence to design major buildings. Lenin's Mausoleum, designed in
1924 by Alexey Shchusev, is the most notable of the few remaining
Constructivist buildings. By the late 1920s, the avant-garde found itself
repudiated by Stalin's increasingly conservative state. Moving away from
modernism, Stalinist-era architecture is best exemplified by the seven nearly
indistinguishable "wedding-cake" skyscrapers that dominate the city's
skyline.
In more recent years, the dissolution of the Soviet state
and a renewed interest in traditional Russian culture have produced a new
appreciation of more modest folk architecture. The few remaining examples of
traditional wooden architecture, such as those on display in the outdoor
architectural museum in Kostroma, are now among Russia's most treasured
architectural monuments.
Comments
Post a Comment